It was stated that as evidence, strikes were minor to employers who who had higher authority and given more power. In 1833, a machinist gave a testimony before the Senate Committee on Labor and Capital stating that “100 men are able to do now what it took 300 or 400 men to do fifteen years ago”(Doc. D). In effect of this, when workers unified and started striking, the Senate immediately expressed no sympathy towards them. The impotence of unions demonstrate that they didn’t have an essential leadership to even reach a point of achieving success initially of developing the society’s attitude towards individual’s positions as workers. Every corporation was diverse so that training, hours as well as wages could be driven down. This was ideally essential for corporations that we interested in lessening the amount of workers in effect to increase the profits in addition to increasing production with an expansion in machines. Improvements for wage laborers were absent because with just only one skill within many subdivisions of any given trade, their skills were devalued. In connection, compared to others, many people firmly supported the Chinese Exclusion Act because they believed that that industrialists were using Chinese workers as a wedge to keep wages