A Brief Summary Of Stephen's Argument

Words: 644
Pages: 3

Argument #1: That God doesn’t interfere

Point: Steven believes that God hasn’t interfered with the workings of the Universe in a billion Years. He argues this, when bringing up the New Testament and how they are ridiculous.
Counterpoint: God has been interfering with the Universe and most directly in Steven’s Life as much as he can when someone doesn’t believe in him. God Counterpoints his argument by saying “Newton” (who his is at the time rejected not only Catholicism but all of Christian Dogma.

Argument #2: Did God start the universe or Did Something Else/ Is God in Fact Moral

Point: In his Dream Stephen begins to question if how Einstein could miss that the universe was moving outward. He then asks did it need something Moral to start it off or something else. He then begins to argue if God were real and if he were moral how could he let a bunch of bad things happen.
…show more content…
Counterpoint: God says Stephen should give him a little more credit then that and that even after his death sentence Stephen would still have a chance to make great headway in science.

Argument #4: The Big Bang- Thus God did not create the universe

Point: Stephen and his scientist are developing a theory on how the universe was created, with the big bang, which leaves a question of what started it in the first