Radiolab created this podcast in order to expose the dangers of broad and ill-defined language. In order to do this, they closely examined what is considered the “most dangerous 60 words in U.S. history” and the detrimental consequences that followed. Radiolab references specific events that were caused by these words to build the credibility of their argument. Radiolab also utilizes rhetorical questions and a conversation-like structure to make their point clear and to keep their audience captivated and engaged.
Instead of using generalized statements to describe the consequences of these 60 broad words, Radiolab cites specific examples and analyzes them in detail.
When Radiolab referenced Guantanamo Bay, their argument was strengthened tremendously. They examine how the phrase “all necessary and appropriate force” was actually the cause for this tragic event. They specifically focus on one word: force. Radiolab shows how the meaning of a word can be altered to fit a situation by showing how detention is actually a “subset of force” and is therefore justified. This gives the listener a specific example of when words were manipulated, and how it was still legal because the language was so broad. By…show more content… These questions are used to engage and challenge the listener. By directly questioning the listener, he or she is more engaged in the podcast. The listener is also challenged to ponder these questions which forces them to fully consider Radiolab’s argument. Some questions, such as “What is force?” are designed to appear simple at first, but then are later found to be more complicated. Most listeners just assume they know what is defined as force when they first hear the question, but after Radiolab explains it, he or she realizes that the meaning can be stretched to include many things. These rhetorical questions allow Radiolab to both engage and persuade the
