There have been many different methods of AAC that have been discovered and tested to see if they are effective on individuals with autism but also other intellectual disabilities. There were six studies done involving twenty-seven participants which were closely monitored while taking part in different AAC interventions (Schlosser). “None of the 27 participants demonstrated decreases in speech production, and 89% showed gains in speech production” (Schlosser). Facilitated communication has been presented to society as a form of augmentative and alternative communication, but many people would disagree with this statement. In the academic journal titled, Facilitated Communication Denies People With Disabilities Their Voice, AAC and FC are contrasted to show the ways how facilitated communication should not be classified as augmentative and alternative communication. One of the major differences that causes controversy is that FC requires the dependence of others, while AAC is independent from others and is a type of functional communication on its own (Travers). Facilitated has even been described as “unwitting ventriloquism” because the individuals are being …show more content…
Sundberg, writes about the advantages and disadvantages of facilitated communication and how it is compared to pointing systems. He states: “Facilitation may be effective in generating verbal behaviors in previously non-vocal individuals for a number of reasons. First, facilitation allows a trainer to easily get an individual to emit a response… The facilitation may also allow for the easier emission of previously strengthened responses including mands, tacts, intraverbals, and autoclintics (Sundberg). On the other hand, Sundberg also states some common disadvantages about facilitated communication, mostly consisting of problems with the response time and response form. One of the disadvantages that can come from facilitated communication, according to Sundberg, are: “The response form is dependent on two types of environmental support: access to a keyboard and physical prompts from a trained facilitator (Sundberg). These certain supports could be disadvantages for people who do not have the money to provide these services for themselves or their loved ones. Another disadvantage that is proposed by Sundberg is: “There is an extremely slow response time compared to speech and sign, and the controlling variables and listener’s attention can be easily lost