1. What is the difference between a Nuremberg Principle
The Abu Ghraib affair, in which Iraqi captives were tortured, degraded, and humiliated, goes against the Nuremberg Trials norms. Also, the Nuremberg Principle applies to US interrogators using waterboarding, a kind of torture that mimics drowning, on detainees during the Iraq War. Mistreatment of inmates violates fundamental human rights and international humanitarian law. Waterboarding and other torture methods violate international law and ethical norms. The Nuremberg Principle would require prosecutors to accuse not only those directly involved in the abuse of war crimes, but also those who sanctioned or permitted such behavior. In addition, there are significant doubts about Guantanamo Bay prison's adherence to the Nuremberg Principle given its operations, where detainees were held without charge or trial for an unlimited period and exposed to claims of torture and abuse. Both…show more content… The tactics and methods employed by supporters on opposing sides of the argument have changed throughout time. The pro-life movement, which opposes abortion and supports the protection of unborn life, has historically focused on legislative efforts to enact laws limiting abortion. These laws aim to limit access to abortion services by imposing required waiting periods, mandatory counseling, and gestational limits. Pro-life groups have also made legal challenges in an effort to overturn or weaken significant rulings pertaining to abortion rights, such as Roe v. Wade (1973). Social media and digital campaigns have become more important tools for pro-life campaigners in recent years as they engage supporters and spread their message. This involves using internet campaigns, movies, and social media to raise awareness of the problem and strengthen support for the
