Main body Power suggested that there is an asymmetry between primary and secondary risk management in the risk management of everything. The secondary risk management experience a remarkable growth during these years and become as important as the primary risk. To a large extent the tendency of increasing risk management of everything could be seen as a defensive reaction to protect the reputation. However, the process of the risk management of everything itself is a certain kind of risk. As a result, the society will suffer serious risks. The risk management is engaged at all level of organizational life including the state, public regulators, private companies, not because of a good understanding of all the uncertainty they face. The fact is that they have no option but to do so, to play a role as if they know the risks. That is means to know the unknowable. However the varying kind of organizations themselves are a source of risk, at the same time they must deal with risk management. The two statement are inconsistence. Today the world is clearly know what is unknowable, but a strong institution-wide risk culture since 1990s tends to create a risk management of everything program. This ambition triggers a series of efforts to enhance the organizational risk-based internal control system, define the new type of risks, set up new agents and risk accountability structures, develop better processes to ally risk with a moral discourse of effective