Advocate Good Samaritan Hospital Case Study

Words: 719
Pages: 3

Advocate Good Samaritan Hospital is part of a faith-based, not-for-profit health system located in Downers Grove, IL. Their mission is to serve the health needs of individuals, families, and communities by way of a wholistic philosophy rooted in the fundamental understanding of human beings as created in God’s image. The practice of wholistic care comes from the understanding that patients have physical, mental, and spiritual needs. It is of high priority that all people are treated with respect and dignity, including patients and staff. (Advocate Health Care, 2017)
This hospital employs over 35,000 associates, which include 6,300 physicians and 11,000 nurses. The staff also includes: The Executive Board Members, Maintenance, Housekeeping,
…show more content…
It is a general medical and surgical facility. Unlike Good Samaritan Hospital, Amita Health is only rated high performing in 3 adult specialties and 3 procedures and conditions; while Good Samaritan Hospital is rated high performing in 5 adult specialties and 5 procedures and conditions. Another minor competitor is Central DuPage Hospital, which is also a general medical and surgical facility, located in Winfield, Illinois.
Good Samaritan Hospital is a large hospital that is a part of Advocate Health Care, which is the largest health system in Illinois. Advocate Medical Group implements a dyad leadership structure where an administrative leader is paired with a clinical leader (Bone & Sacks, 2015). This leadership structure dictates the organizational structure for the general hospital, in this case Advocate Good Samaritan Hospital.
The organizational structure at the general hospital level is complex, but entails highly structured and formal entities. Each entity has uniform rules, policies, and procedures to follow. The individuals in these groups are specialized in their respective group receiving standard pay, roles, and responsibilities. Each entity has a defined authority. Entities are grouped to achieve efficiency. These groupings include administrative services, informational services, therapeutic services, diagnostic services, and support services. (Alzona,