Alexander The Great Leadership

Words: 1386
Pages: 6
Open Document
Title To be a kind-hearted leader or a leader with good intentions is not the same as being an effective leader. Adolf Hitler did not have good intentions. Rather, his intentions were set on mass democide. His insidious intentions do not change the fact that he was a very effective leader. He managed to captivate the minds of entire countries, causing them to carry out actions that are considered macabre at the least without so much as a blink of an eye. Alexander the Great, similarly, knew how to work people to his will so that he could effectively rule most of the known world. In a way, effective leadership is synonymous with influence. If one fails to win the people over, or loses their approval, they lose their claim to effective leadership. …show more content…
Rather, he seems quite weak. He doesn’t have confidence in himself and wishes for death every time a hardship occurs. However, by the end of the book he has grown to become a more confident. From the first book, he shows signs of weakness as a leader. His first failure is when he is incapable of leading his own wife out of the city. He is supposed to lead many men and women to safety, but at this point he can’t even lead his the one person who is supposed to follow his every command loyally. After this he laments for bereavement regularly, not being able to look forward, but only wallow in pity. He has no confidence in himself, which is an essential trait to leadership, and always looks to the past. He appears to be too weak to be a leader, which the people notice. His incompetence as a leader reaches its apex in their second trip to Sicily, when the women raze his ships. This shows his incapability to keep even the women under control, who are supposed to be docile and domestic. Here he lacks both the power to put down anarchy and the support of the people. From here, only a few loyal citizens follow him to his promise land. Therefore, before their visit to the underworld, he reflects none of the traits of an effective leader. Although the divine intervention of Juno is blamed for his shortcomings up to this point, she only spurred the actions, for instance, the women acted of their own free …show more content…
He lacks in another trait of a good leader as well, control. He can’t control any of the women in his city, and fails horribly when he tries to take back power. Dionysius easily dupes him and can get him to do what he wants. This could show that he doesn’t have confidence in his own decisions, so he would take advice from even a man he refuses to acknowledge as a god. The Greeks viewed approval of the Gods as a trait of a hero or a good leader, so Penthius’ lack of favor with the gods, specifically Dionysius, could be the author’s way of showing his wanting in terms of leadership. In the end, his shortcomings literally results in his death, by means of being torn apart by his own
Show More

Related Documents: Alexander The Great Leadership

Why Is Alexander The Great Was Great

they’ve done. Alexander the Great traveled from Macedonia to India from the age 20 to early 30’s. Alexander achieved many different goals he had for himself. At the age of 20 he became the leader of Macedonia, and the city-states of Greece. After he became the leader he decided to try and take over the Persian empire, in which he succeeded. After succeeding his goal only a few days later he died from an illness. Alexander the Great is great, he deserved the title. Alexander the Great of Macedonia…

Words 722 - Pages 3

Key Characteristics Of Alexander The Great

Alexander the Great Alexander the great, was a great and powerful leader. “Born in Mesopotamia in the year 356 B.C” (BGE) . His father Philip of Macedonia and his mother Olympia hired philosopher Aristotle academic subjects to prepare him to become the king. Philip was assassinated in 336 B.C and Alexander took over. Was Alexander great? Alexander was a great leader because of three main characteristics. These characteristics are military intelligence, his remarkable achievements, and his leadership…

Words 457 - Pages 2

Alexander The Great Dbq Analysis

Alexander The Great had a father who was a King and his mother who was a Queen. His father was King Philip of Macedonia, and his mother, Olympia. King Philip was assassinated at the age of 20 and Alexander was soon King. Alexander was great for these reasons, his leadership skills, concern for others, and his intelligence. Alexander went east from Macedonia on a rampage for land. He concord all of west Asia, Egypt surrendered because Egypt didn’t like being under Persians, and last concord most…

Words 253 - Pages 2

Alexander The Great's Role In The Battle Of Gaugamela

make it how it is today. This battle occurred in a small town named Gaugamela located in the Persian Empire. Alexander the Great, king of the Macedonia, was pitted against King Darius III, king of the Persian Empire, in a decisive battle that would change the world forever. Alexander the Great’s role in the Battle of Gaugamela illustrated his patience, exemplary strategy, and strong leadership. The Battle of Gaugamela was on King Darius’s land in the Persian Empire. It was located in modern-day northern…

Words 718 - Pages 3

List Three Characteristics Of An Effective Leader (Graded)

Leader (graded) List 3 characteristics of effective leaders. Explain why you chose these characteristics. Provide an e.g., of an effective leader & show how they demonstrate these characteristics. It is apparent that leadership is a rather difficult term to precisely define. Leadership is a very complex phenomenon, yet it is highly valued. Characteristics I believe to contribute to the success of a leader are: 1. Composed and steadfast to the main purpose. Emotions, crises and storms eventually subside…

Words 373 - Pages 2

A Person Great Dbq

certain qualities or achievements that made them great. Some people like Mathure Luther King were great. Some things like leadership skill, discipline, integrity and more makes a person great. A person like Alexander can be called great. He has a few of the qualities that make a person great. For example Alexander invaded the Persian empire and expanded his empire, with 10 cities named after him (Document A). In document B it talks about how Alexander defeated the Porus with a strategy. Most people…

Words 190 - Pages 1

Alexander The Great Research Paper

Alexander was considered one of the best conquers of all time. But is he really “Great?” Most people think he is great because of his nickname, “Alexander the Great.” I agree he does deserve the title,”Alexander The Great.” For example, Alexander won his first battle when he was only 16. You may ask,”how did we lead a battle when he was only 16?” We do know that his father was very ill, and couldn’t lead his army into battle. So Young Alexander marched his army into his first battle without or nearly…

Words 274 - Pages 2

Alexander The Great Research Paper

know that Alexander the Great conquered three continents? Alexander the Great was a great military leader and was really brave, which is one of the reasons why he was such a great leader and a hero. People have many different opinions on Alexander the Great. Some believe that Alexander was a villain because he destroyed and attacked many places. Others believe that Alexander was a hero because he tried to promote learning. I believe that Alexander the Great was a hero because he was a great role model…

Words 467 - Pages 2

Why Did the Achaemenid Empire Fall? Essay

a number of Persian Empires, but none of them can compare to the great Achaemenid Empire, which ruled between 550 to 330BC. The Achaemenid Empire is known as the largest empire in Ancient history which stretched out approximately 8 million km² at the height of its power. So how does an Empire so large and with such great power collapse? Was it struggle for power, which every new king had to suffer after the death of Darius the Great? Or was it because of corruption of the ministers and Satraps that…

Words 1212 - Pages 5

Alexander The Great Research Paper

Alexander the Great – The Decisive Battle Power & Leadership Professor Stevens Alexander the great was one of the greatest leaders of his time. His reign kingdom crumbled almost as fast as it was created. Alexander was a fearless leader with great battlefield intelligence. He conquered many kingdoms and created one of the largest kingdoms ever to exist. He won battles with military tactics, large armies, and a savage attitude. Alexander arrived to battles with three times as many soldiers…

Words 444 - Pages 2