Daniel Peart in his review of the book stated, “All in all, The Birth of Modern Politics provides a perfectly readable account of the life and times of two of the early republic’s most significant political figures. Beyond this, however, it offers neither a startling new reading of the available evidence nor a comprehensive review of the existing scholarship” (Peart, 2010, p. 256). Peart believes that other than the background facts shared in the first two chapters and the fact it covers two political figures, the book written by Parsons should not be a historical text. Peart also said, “The Birth of Modern Politics fares better if judged solely by its subtitle, but even as a straightforward account of the personalities and politics of the 1828 election it suffers from some important defects” (Peart, 2010, p.255). Peart believes that undergraduate students should not be able to use this text, because he deems it lackluster. Jonathan M. Atkins says in his review, “The Birth of Modern Politics: Andrew Jackson, John Quincy Adams, and the Election of 1828 is a valuable resource. Scholars will find little new here, but few other accounts present the story as thoughtfully” (Atkins, 2010, p.991). Atkins believes that the book does bring historical facts that are important, and he