Essay about Analysis of Caesar

Submitted By philipfentress
Words: 604
Pages: 3
Open Document
Development of Brutus In the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, there were several complex characters. A complex character is a type of character that has more than one dimension. He or she's attitude and behaviors shift to adapt to a situation. Among the characters in the play, Brutus emerges as the most complex character in Julius Caesar. During the course of the play, Brutus's over-idealistic tendencies shift to reckless behaviors and ultimately result in his demise. To start off, Brutus was not only the most complex character, but also the tragic hero of the play. In his soliloquies, the audience gains insight into the complexities of his motives. He is an influential public figure, a husband, an honorable military leader, and a close friend of Julius Caesar (I.ii.160-75). One of his qualities that make him such an exemplary Roman is his Roman idealism. He is bound so tightly to his values that he decides to kill his closest friend, Caesar, for the greater good of Rome. This choice, however, does not come without conflict. The conflicting value systems that clash with each other in the play as a whole are enacted on a microcosmic level in Brutus’s mind. Brutus develops from being a careful, over-idealistic Roman to someone who begins taking unnecessary risks as he attempts to deal with the disastrous after-effects of killing Caesar. Early in the play we see the philosophical, methodical side to his personality as he argues at length with himself over whether he should join in with the conspiracy against Caesar or not (II.i.5-30). However, in the final stages when forced to join battle with Antony and Octavius after the assassination, he starts to become a bit more reckless. This is seen most obviously when Cassius considers staying where they are rather than advancing to attack the enemy at Philippi. Brutus at this point completely throws out all caution, insisting that they be proactive rather than waiting passively for battle. Brutus now is insisting to capture the moment, to take action immediately rather than fall back out of fear and later regret losing their chance(III.ii.15-30). He therefore appears quite different from the hesitant man of the play’s opening scenes. There is more than a hint of anxiety in Brutus at this point too. We
Show More

Related Documents: Essay about Analysis of Caesar

Analysis Of Julius Caesar

the central character Caesar, allows the audience to enhance their understanding of the character’s significance in the play to a larger extent. It exposes the motivations, functions and the range of perceptions that other characters adopt pertaining to Caesar. The main motive that Caesar displays is the pursuit of power and glory. His function in the play is to lead the Roman people and leave behind an important legacy. The ways in which other characters in the play view Caesar vary and this highlights…

Words 904 - Pages 4

Rhetorical Analysis Of Marcus Caesar

of knowing Caesar. He is saying that Caesar was always fair and just and a true friend would know that. Antony’s goal of his speech is to turn the commoners against the conspirators without directly ordering anything, so they think a civil war was all the plebeians idea. Brutus’ approach is much different. He tries to connect with the plebeians through the way he talks and addresses them. He also attempts to avoid their anger by claiming he killed Caesar for the greater good, “As Caesar loved me,…

Words 159 - Pages 1

Julius Caesar Dbq Analysis

A long time ago a great leader named Julius Caesar was murdered. In 44 B.C. Julius Caesar was praised by many. The citizens were so happy for their new leader and loved him. But not all loved him as a dictator. His power threatened the senate and they were jealous. So they conspired and made a plan to assassinate Julius and culprits are Brutus, Cassius, and the rest of the senate. First of all Brutus, according to document A he persuaded Julius to go to the Senate house. That means he wanted Julius…

Words 399 - Pages 2

Julius Caesar Quote Analysis

Julius Caesar is a play written by William Shakespeare that tells of true events of the Roman Empire. It tells of Julius Caesar’s rise to power when he receives the crown and his fall when he is killed by Brutus and the conspirators. Even though Caesar’s murder was a surprise considering Brutus was his best friend, there was many warnings that gave insights to the future. Many characters throughout the play, Julius Caesar, ignore signs that foreshadow not only their futures by the future of Rome…

Words 898 - Pages 4

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

for Rome to continue to prosper, as once Caesar became king, he would become a threat. Considering the trust that he already had with the citizens, they were easily convinced that…

Words 748 - Pages 3

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

Title of Your Report In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Antony’s speech is more effective than Brutus’s because Antony studied the Roman people and knew how they react to certain rhetorical appeals, whereas Brutus was faulty in his examination of the crowd therefore causing the crowd to follow Antony. Antony was a masterful orator, appealing to the people's sense of why Caesar was murdered. Antony painted a picture with his words showing the people that the conspirators were nothing more than power…

Words 698 - Pages 3

Julius Caesar Feminist Analysis

William Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar follows the tragic tale of Julius Caesar, who was politically assassinated. The senate did not like what he was doing to Rome, so his best friend, Brutus, killed him. Before Caesar was assassinated he was the army leader/dictator that still had a Senate that followed what he said to do. Every story and play needs to have its tragic figure, and the tragic figure in this play is Caesar. To be a tragic figure, you must have a fatal flaw, and Caesar’s flaw was…

Words 657 - Pages 3

Julius Caesar Bias Analysis

Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, bias through the power of argument is used vividly by all characters. However, in one particular scene with Julius Caesar and his wife, Calpurnia, debate whether or not Caesar should leave the house and go to work that particular day. That particular was March fifteenth- this was the day that Caesar was destined to die. By Calpurnia saying “Do not go forth to-day: call it my fear.” (Shakespeare 31) This word choice and extreme bias influenced Caesar for a short time. This…

Words 458 - Pages 2

Julius Caesar Character Analysis

In Julius Caesar Shakespeare shows how being the one in power cannot always be the safest place for a person. Caesar has returned from a long expedition of war, but with his victorious return comes fear for some of the citizens of Rome. Caesar now stands alone from the triumvirate and there is a lot of talk that he will be crowned king. Caesar being crowned would go against all the traditions of the Roman Republic of having no singular monarch, but with Caesar’s reputation and popularity there…

Words 836 - Pages 4

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

In William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, the power of persuasion takes center stage as Mark Antony and Brutus address the Roman crowd in the aftermath of Caesar's assassination. Through the use of rhetorical devices such as repetition and rhetorical questions, Antony strives to sway the people's opinion regarding the conspirators. Meanwhile, Brutus employs his own rhetorical ability to justify the assassination, relying heavily on appeals to ethos. These speeches provide a fascinating study of the…

Words 835 - Pages 4