Ivy leagues are known as institutions that hold the crème de la crème of students. Therefore, making them the best hunting grounds for the financial sector to recruit the ideal pupil that convey the stigma that they associate with “smartness”. To belong in Wall Street “a naturalized and generic sense of “impressiveness”, of elite, pinnacle status and expertise, which is used to signify, even prove, investment bankers’ worthiness as advisors “(Ho 167). They are looking for the best candidates to work in their platform and because of the universities high regard for intelligence, these practices usually acquire people from elite institutions. Thus, following a culture where people with similar attributes conjure the same jobs with little differences what so ever. The finical sector seeks these individuals because “competitive markets, working through the laws of supply and demand, determine the value of each individual’s contributions. If someone has a scarce and valuable skill, the market will reward him amply, because of his greater contribution to output. If he has no skills, his income will be low” (Stiglitz 395). Markets seeks individuals that are highly competitive, smart, headstrong, and cut throat. Moreover, markets look for individuals that reward them with the most money because they are not willing to sacrifice their funds for those who do not make great contributions to their market. Without these individuals their markets crash, their intelligence is what makes the market stay relevant within the economy. They are the ones that dominate, that ones who perform in the degree of excellence that makes the market what it is today. Elite institutions produce these individuals by the hundreds and the financial sector take advantage by scouting them with ideals of prosperity and revenue. Elite institutions and the financial sector form an