This is the overarching theme of Berger’s essay “Ways of Seeing”, that our experiences and environment greatly affects how we see, especially in art. He supports this by explaining how a piece of art would look …show more content…
This is why I can’t connect with Descartes’ Meditations because they are not remotely structural. I find the scattered nature of his thinking inefficient and destructive because he destroys his thoughts instead of building upon them. In the two meditations, Descartes contemplates what is real in his opinions and what is real in the universe. In the first meditation, he focuses on deciding that all his previous opinions are false, therefore destroying them and that only the things he can actually sense are real. Even though he decides this, he begins to wonder if even his senses deceive him and if God is deceiving him. However, if God is all good and all knowing as he believes, would God actually deceive him? To get over this confusion Descartes decides that it is actually the devil deceiving him, and not the supremely good God. In the second meditation, Descartes goes full out in believing that nothing he knows or senses is real, not even