On the other hand, some may argue that the Native Americans removal was a representation of Jackson putting the needs of his people above the wants of another and that it represented Jackson's capability to make quick tough decisions for the benefit of the nation. Through the Indian removal act Jackson managed to gain multiple acres of fertile land to satisfy the cravings of the white settlers. However, was the land really gained or stolen? Did it serve to benefit the nation or lead to its destruction? In the document Map Comparison it shows an image of two maps that reflect two different time periods. The first map shows the forceful removal of Native Americans to the west, which was done in order to make way for the incompationate power craving white settlers that would occupy the homes the Native Americans left behind, this occurred from the 1831-40s. The second map shows the American south in the 1850’s. It shows the vast increase in the growth of cash crops like cotton, sugarcane and tobacco, such crops required manual labor to pick and often slaves were used for cheap manual labor. The usage of the land may have been economically successful, but morally and ethnically it was