Many people, for example historians, describe Andrew Jackson as an “Indian-hater.” He frequently fought against Native Americans. Jackson fought the Creeks in eighteen-thirteen and eighteen-fourteen that got him his first national military. He wanted to establish a process where Jackson could authorized land west of the Mississippi River to Indian tribes in exchange for their homelands. His promising requests for a bigger cession of Creek lands were a portion of his care for safety in the West. Cherokees and Chickasaws giving up their overlapping claims to lands within the Creek cession initiated a pathway to the protection of the lower country. One example that proved that Jackson took action tophild the rights of Native Americans was when…show more content… He faced a difficult problem with the Indians; however, there were four possible solutions for this problem. One of them seem more of an answer to Jackson. The first alternative was that the Indians could have been destroyed. For example, they could have been executed at war. They could also have been brutally chased out of their establishments, or they could have been moved West off the land y a very strong force until they were consumed by an infection or of deprivation. The Indians could have been very quickly incorporated into a white civilization. That was the second alternative to the answer Jackson decided on in the end. The third is since the Indians were not destroyed nor instantly incorporated with the white community then they could possibly be guarded in their own culture on their tribal lands in the East. However, they would then be dominated within the white civilization. The final possibility was removal. This was Jackson's only solution to the Indian problem. It seem to him the most acceptable and essential answer. Moving the Indians to an area where they would not troubled by federal-state jurisdiction arguments or by arrogated of white settlers, was the best solution in Jackson’s
