Garcia states that the lawyer “stood by the thesis of homicide in legitimate defense of honor” (Marquez 55). Then satirically adds the fact that this was upheld by the court in “good faith” (Marquez 55). Human nature evokes the reader’s emotional response of viewing this act as an indiscretion, however, the society portrays the exact opposite reaction by acting apathetic. While in court the reader is able to see this lack of intrinsic values in the testimony of Pablo and Pedro when they state that “they would’ve done it again a thousand times over for the same reason” (Marquez 55). The brothers would have never said this if they believed that defending one’s honor by homicide was wrong. Even after this confession the jury still found the brother’s innocent of the murder. No one in the society would ever question an act if it was made with the intent of preserving one’s