When the English army fails to rescue them, she explains that this is clearly because “God did not give them [the soldiers] courage or activity to go after us” (274). In other words, God could have intervened, but chose not to. This account seems at odds with many contemporary views of God’s benevolence and the idea that God gave us free will. My paper will closely examine and analyze passages from Rowlandson’s narrative that demonstrate this tendency. Ultimately, I may conclude that some elements of Rowlandson’s belief system are fundamentally different from typical modern views of God. However, there are many other aspects of her account that contemporary readers can relate to. For example, like Rowlandson, we all suffer, and we must find ways to make sense of that suffering—we must try to understand why dreadful things have to happen. We must believe that it means something. If it’s appropriate and I can make it fit, I may briefly discuss this as well. Literary Criticism Quote: Richard VanDerBeets, writing in the Journal of American Literature, states that Rowlandson’s work was popular because it conveys the “moral instruction” that was so much a part of the Puritan life at the time, particularly the “Calvinist aspect of their ideology”