Appellant V. Ltd

Words: 590
Pages: 3

1. Title and Citation
Martha Duncan, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SCOTTSDALE MEDICAL IMAGING, LTD., an Arizona corporation; Hospital Radiologists, Ltd., an Arizona corporation, Defendants-Appellees. 70 P.3d 435, 205 Ariz. 306 (2003).
2. Which court decided this case
Arizona Supreme Court
3. How did the case get to the court? Discuss the procedural history.
Defendant Scottsdale Medical Imaging, Ltd., and Hospital Radiologist, Ltd., was sued by Ms. Duncan because Nurse Gary Fink gave Duncan the wrong drug for her MRI. She “initially asserted three claims: medical malpractice (count 1), lack of informed consent (count 2), and battery (count 3)” (Jones).
4. What legal issues were decided in this case?
Issues
5. Facts of the case.
On