The main difference among the seatbelt laws in the states is the actual type of enforcement. Many states have switched their type of enforcement from secondary to primary, or vice versa, providing yet another variation in regulation. The effects that primary enforcement have on the higher seat belt usage rates represent the increase of usage when restrictions and penalties are placed on those who do not choose to abide by the law. In concurrence with the influence of primary enforcement on seat belt usage rates, secondary enforcement also increases the overall usage, but not by as large a percentage. With that being said, it is the role of the Federal Government to encourage states to adopt further primary enforcement as well as increasing secondary enforcement to maintain stability. The Federal Government's role in seat belt regulation has become increasingly controversial. As previously stated, many believe that seat belt laws infringe upon individual rights. This controversy is comparably similar to that of the Second Amendment or regulations regarding cigarettes. With such similarities to other important mandations in our nation’s history, the Federal Government will probably allow individual states to mandate their own seat belt laws, as with many other