Argumentative Essay On Torture

Words: 1031
Pages: 5
Open Document
ON TORTURE

This paper will systematically investigate different positions taken on the moral permissibility of torture, to reveal that torture is not to be accepted or justified under any circumstance.

In order to effectively address the matter, we ought to come to definitional terms with “torture”, despite the lack of unanimity and the spread of contextual usage of the term. For the scope of this paper, the term “torture” will be adopted to refer to any act by which mental or physical pain is inflicted on a person as punishment for an accused act, or coercion as a means to acquire confessions or information.
In defense of the argument for the absolute prohibition of torture the understanding of the phenomenology of torture is pivotal; …show more content…
A key to understanding this decline of interrogation into violence is through a communicative model developed by Jurgen Habermas (The Theory of Communicative Action, 1981) that goes into the restrictions of “strategic” conversation that is based on manipulation as opposed to reasonability and expression that are found in “communicative” structures. The former “strategic” model adopted by interrogators makes it nearly impossible for them to assert any truthfulness, which is what they are required to do, and hence the jump to the use of force for acquiring truthful information becomes the only possible way. In addition, the more the interrogatee withholds vital information the more he/she is viewed to be inhumane therefore acts of torture, of escalating degrees, become justified in view of the interrogator.
It is to be concluded that the economic model does not make a good case for the moral permissibility of torture. Also in our analysis of the “strategic” model that restricts both the interrogator and interrogatee, violence will be a viable option. However, if that option is resorted to, there are detrimental prolonged and immediate effects on the human being tortured. Therefore, the wrongness of torture is not be underestimated and that there are no conditions under which torture could be viewed as being morally
Show More

Related Documents: Argumentative Essay On Torture

My Paper

How is Torture generally defined? According to various definitions, most forms of torture include the infliction of extreme physical pain. According to a recent article by Seumas Miller from Stanford University, “torture is (a) the intentional infliction of extreme physical suffering on some non-consenting, defenceless person; (b) the intentional, substantial curtailment of the exercise of the person’s autonomy (achieved by means of (a)) ; and (c) in general, undertaken for the purpose of breaking…

Words 938 - Pages 4

Essay on Torture: Abuse and Senator Mccain

First Name, Last Name Essay #2 - Torture Discussion Essay Instructor, Margaret Anderson ENG-111 Torture – An Unnecessary Evil At issue are whether torture should be permissible, and what the implications of said permissibility are to foreign nations. For this discussion, “torture” is defined as a non-lethal means of extracting information from a suspected malefactor for the purpose of using that information to save innocent lives in an emergency situation, or “ticking time bomb” scenario…

Words 1582 - Pages 7

Hippocratic Oath And Euthanasia Research Paper

Yasmin Osman Prof. Gregory Polakoff Humanities BXH March 30, 2017 The Hippocratic Oath and Euthanasia: The Stance of Morality on Euthanasia Through every revolution, the world has been inclined to follow rules and to abide by what is written in the books. The resistance to evolution is due to the comfort of what is known, and fear of shifting this comfort into curiosity. Steps have continuously been taken by those who wish to rewrite the present, towards creating a substantially better version…

Words 1499 - Pages 6

Philosophy Final Review Essay

practical rationality The use of reason to determine what actions one should perform. what actions one should perform? what makes an action good? or more specifically what makes an action practically rational? Should I skip class, because I am doing well. Kant asked what makes an action good or what makes an action practically rational what to do, what action is need for some goal. According to Kan'ts moral philosophy, it is defined as the capacity of a rational being to act according to principles…

Words 4122 - Pages 17