There are three types of arguments: Rhetoric, Refutation and Rogerian. While Rogerian might not be the winner of arguments, they are more for understanding. You can persuade, debunk, or gain understanding, depending on your position. Because politicians often use rhetoric, Rogerian arguments are more for Switzerland, and lawyers use refutation in the courtroom. So, whether you're trying to win over an audience, challenge an opponent, or foster understanding, the key lies in choosing the right argumentative strategy for the situation at hand. By recognizing the strengths and nuances of each type of argument, you can navigate discussions with clarity, empathy, and purpose.
Donald Trump uses a lot of rhetoric. When he is being interviewed, he uses a mixture of ethos, pathos and logos. Pathos, however, is very powerful and often evokes a Kairos reaction. It also creates division, which again, is used in politics. Take an interview with Bernie Sanders, when he is asked about a hot topic, he positions himself on the outside of the argument and then comes back using words that encompass togetherness like “us”. That is how persuasion is done by speaking to the opposing side and gaining their…show more content… This is because this type of argument is made to gain understanding. Interestingly, divorce lawyers often employ Rogerian arguments to help estranged couples reach compromises and settlements amicably. This method can be especially useful in cases where disagreements are deeply rooted and emotional, sometimes prolonging divorce proceedings. Often these types of arguments are not found in politics. However, a bipartisan consensus was reached in Congress regarding TikTok was made in 2024 which could lead to the banning of the famous App. But regardless of this one off, the utilization of Rogerian arguments remains uncommon, as the adversarial nature of political discourse often prioritizes winning over
