Aristotle's Argumentative Essay

Words: 662
Pages: 3
Open Document
Arguments have been around ever since the first humans talked to each other. Aristotle figured out how to improve an argument by appealing to three key factors: Ethos, Pathos, and Logos. This helped make arguments be more persuasive and affective to the audience. However, over the years, arguments have been less affective due to fallacies that causes faulty reasoning and misleading truths. First, lets go over Aristotle’s three key factors to a persuasive argument starting with Ethos. Bill Nye is a world-renowned scientist and even hosted a science show to kids. Was award several honorary doctor of science degrees from numerous Institutes. On Earth day 2017, he made an argument about climate change and how we all need to do our part to “save the world”. He uses Ethos to convey his message because he is a scientist talking about science. People look up to him and he uses that to help him …show more content…
On December 7, 1941, Pearl Harbor was attacked and caused America’s involvement in World War 2. Franklin D. Roosevelt gave a speech addressing the American people about the event that had taken on that day. One sentence he said, “I regret to tell you that very many American lives have been lost” (Roosevelt), he says this to convey his sympathy for the American people. Then, goes on tell the American people that he will do something about the attack on Pearl Harbor, and pursues Congress to declare war on Japan.
Lastly, the final Aristotle factor is logos. It is probably the most used and deals with logic to argue the point. Blake Ellison wrote an article about the which video game was better, Call of Duty or Battlefield, and he used logos to prove his point. He argued that because Call of Duty sold more units than Battlefield, that Call of Duty was a better game. He even went so far to get the rates of the games and compared the score to each other. This shows how to use logos to pursue an
Show More

Related Documents: Aristotle's Argumentative Essay

Essay on Plato’s argument about the value and nature of rhetoric

RHET 120 Goss Essay Plato’s argument about the value and nature of rhetoric AcerA2 102013 2/14/2014 Similar to the other ancient philosophers, Plato remains a virtue based eudemonistic thought of ethics. As many defined that Rhetoric is the art of discourse. It is believed to be the important element to keep writer or speaker to reach the purpose of inform, persuade, and motivate with particular audience. In addition, rhetoric has played a crucial role in the Western tradition in the…

Words 846 - Pages 4

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Pentadic

an academic study, has been hotly examined & challenged for ages. But what exactly is rhetoric? Well, as it turns out, answering this question is quite complex as it requires a thorough level of knowledge in regard to rhetorical methodology and argumentative strategy. This is because there abundantly are intellectuals within this area of expertise whose viewpoints in defining rhetoric differ significantly, resulting in very narrow room for consensus as far as conceptualization goes. As such, the…

Words 2962 - Pages 12

Rhetoric and Argument Essay

not represent paragraphs; they represent distinct segments of an argumentative essay and, with the exception of the introduction and thesis statement, the body of an essay can be situated in any fashion that is most effective at convincing a given audience. Section One: Introduction and Thesis—Your introduction should describe the rhetorical situation and give the audience a clear forecast of the material you will cover in your essay. Your thesis statement should make a clear, limited, descriptive…

Words 1336 - Pages 6