v. Kelley), presented legitimate evidence of the length of time used to train a new employee to the point of making a profit for the company. Thus justifying the six month restraint on Kelly's employment (202 Ariz. 370, 45 P.3d 1219). Results differed with Bryceland v. Northey ), where Bryceland presented evidence that had shown the employees, disk-jockeys, received fourteen weeks of school and training, this did not rationalize the two year employment restriction (160 Ariz. 213, 772 P.2d 36). Since Guy has been employed at Pretentious for only two years, it seem evident that two years would be the maximum amount of time needed to train another baker to the point of Guy's