Moreover, in paragraph four and five, he explained his argument by supporting his point of view by what professor Lino Graglia said about a misunderstanding of the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” The authors and ratifiers of the 14th amendment couldn’t imply to give a birthright citizenship to a child of illegal immigrants because at that time the law had no restriction for the immigrants, and nobody would take into consideration that in about 150 years the situation would change dramatically, and the United States as a nation of immigrants would experience uncontrollable waves of illegal aliens. Furthermore, in paragraph six and seven Will also pointed out other groups of people, who are excluded from the birthright citizenship. If the supporters of birthright citizenship fight for equal rights for the children whether or not their parents legally staying in U.S., why were the Indians excluded from birthrights even though they were “at least partially subject to U.S. jurisdiction”? Also, a child of a foreign diplomatic officer not allowed to get a citizenship because technically he is not subject to the jurisdiction of the