My reasoning for this is because Zana proves to be considering the society she is subjected to as a whole. She figured out, although I think anyone would if they personally visited the Red Light District, that it is best to get the children out of there as soon as possible. They are only going to be hurt worse if they stay. She made a good judgement based on the culture and promiscuity of where she was in Kolkata. When attempting to get to get the children into the boarding schools, Zana takes the children to the doctor to be HIV tested when she very well could have just said that they were not carriers. This proves that she respected the school boards authority when she told the administration woman that she didn’t know if they had been tested. I don't know if it’s a district or country law but either way Zana respected and honestly told the truth about the children’s medical …show more content…
It states, “The fact that the lives of some of the children worsened doesn't surprise me. Briski is quite clear that her goal isn't to extract the kids, or save them at any cost. Rather, she wants to help them help themselves, without severing them from their families or their surroundings. With that goal and that methodology, it's virtually inevitable that there will be some failures” (Singh, 2005). This is perfect. It’s a great example of Briski’s unfailing determination to help the children have better lives. It’s wonderful to witness the unselfishness of some people who completely sacrifice their live to help the less fortunate. It really encourages me to help others and want to do it too. Look how many lives you could potentially