This source brings light to the debate and consequences that sugar has, and will even go into details about how the sugar industry funded much research to downplay sugar and blame fat for the cause of heart disease. We will further examine how bribery and lies could change the beliefs of millions of people, and how elite scientists could create a nutrition sham, for essentially very little money. This source might have the most impact on this research paper as it is the main source that examines the issues and details on the corruption that surfaced in the food industry during the …show more content…
We will see how three Harvard scientists created research and evidence to switch the blame from sugar to fat, with the bribery of what is equivalent to $50,000 in today’s currency. The journal will outline the harm saturated fats, cholesterol and triglycerides play in the development of heart disease, and the minimal effects sugar has on the same issue. With the help of other sources in my research paper, we will see the contrast this paper brings against other scientific journals that provide better, more updated knowledge on this issue. Further we will examine how, even though the study was officially funded by multiple medical and governmental grants, the sugar industry essentially had the last say on what made it in the paper and picked the specific research information that made it to publication. By examining the research and the rhetoric, we will see how this paper shaped the thoughts of food nutrition for many years to