Jacoby says “ But there would be no cachet in chaining a criminal to an outdoor post and flogging him. If young punks were horsewhipped in public after their first conviction, fewer of them would harden into lifelong felons.” Jacoby believes that prisons wouldn’t spend so much money on them for having to incarcerate criminals. This quote gives an example of young criminals having a chance to change their ways if they are flogged. Jacoby gives the other side a chance to counter their part in why flogging would be wrong. He talks about how the opposite side who disagree with him believe it's degrading and brutal. Jacoby argues though by saying “Why is it more brutal to flog a wrongdoer than to throw him in prison -- where the risk of being beaten, raped, or murdered is terrifyingly high” with this in mind he is giving more of a reason to defend his thesis about why flogging should be used for criminals, flogging is straightforward and by doing so publicly, there will be less crimes