In the decision the Court addresses some of the questions John Marshall settle during the time of the early Court, however, this more modern Court takes it to the next level. Rather than appealing to the Constitution the Court, in Cooper, appeals over and over to its own authority given to them by precedent from former decisions, “Smith v. Texas… Bolling v. Sharpe… Brown v. Board.” The Court also harkens back to Chief Justice Marshall’s adjudication on judicial supremacy writing, “ Marshall… referring to the Constitution as ‘the fundamental and paramount law of the nation,’... ‘it is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.” What the Court has done here is, if done in the instance of Biblical interpretation, is considered an obvious and egregious sin; taking words out of