1-6 Freedom of speech let the people in our society to freely voice their political opinions and criticize government actions or policies. This case is a dilemma for everyone involved, the city of New York is trying to stop what for them is a major problem for the city the vandalism and defacement of public property caused by unauthorized graffiti. Since the year of 2005 the city banned the sale of spray-paint cans and broad-tipped indelible markers to person under the age of twenty-one. Still the city have had problems with vandalism and defacement after banned the products, the new rules on other hand will also affect artist and students that creates graffiti legally in a negative way. My opinion is that the court should not grant the request to prohibit the rules enforcement, because the city of New York has for decade struggled with the problem of illegal graffiti. Now the city can punish the people that commit illegal graffiti, and I am sure that artist and students that works with graffiti in legal ways will find their way around to purchase the products if they are under the age of twenty-one. So why I still want the law to be around is that it will benefit the city of New York in more ways because now the city can punish the bad people.