Big Time Toymaker

Words: 1258
Pages: 6
Open Document
Case Scenario: Big Time Toymaker Based on the Case Scenario: Theory to Practice scenario involving Big Time Toymaker (BTT), a company that develops, manufactures, and distributes board games and other toys globally, entered into an agreement with Chou, an independent inventor of a new strategy game he name Strat, to distribute this new game. However, over more than a 90-day period, BTT reneged on the agreement and was in breach of contract stating BTT were no longer interested in distributing Chou's new strategy game. This paper examines whether BTT and Chou, in fact, have a contract, and what remedies may apply, through answering the following six questions.
At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? To answer this …show more content…
This clearly shows the impact of communication via e-mail on the validity of a contract regardless of how much the specifics appear to be ambiguous. This is because Chou was under the impression that the e-mail sent by BTT that stated all the terms was meant to replace his earlier notion of drafting a distribution agreement. According to All Business (2012): "If an e-mail or chain of e-mails clearly states an offer for entering into a deal with all of the material terms and the other side responds by e-mail accepting the terms, then there's a good chance that a valid contract has been formed — even though no signatures have been exchanged. (2012)"
What role does the statute of frauds play in this contract? There are certain agreements made that are required to be written that cannot be verbal are governed by the Statute of Frauds. Because e-mails had been exchanged between both parties stipulating the same subject matter, and there key terms of the distribution agreement, which included the price, time frames, and obligations of both parties stated in the e-mail; this exchange can be evidence as proof of an agreement to contract. According to Cavnett (2009): "If you make a verbal agreement and wish to avoid the problems with evidence, you can simply ask for written confirmation of the terms of your agreement. This can be done simply by writing an e-mail to the other person outlining the terms you verbally agreed on.
Show More

Related Documents: Big Time Toymaker

Case Scenario: Big Time Toymaker

Case Scenario: Big Time Toymaker LAW/421 Case Scenario: Big Time Toymaker Big Time Toymaker (BTT) develops, manufactures, and distributes board games and other toys in North America, Chou is the inventor of a new strategy game he calls Strat. BTT had an interest in distributing Strat and entered into an agreement with Chou, offering him $25,000 in exchange for exclusive negotiation rights for a 90-day period. This agreement stipulated that no distribution contract existed unless it was in writing…

Words 2111 - Pages 9

Big Time Toymaker Case Study

Case Scenario: Big Time Toymaker LAW 421 Case Scenario: Big Time Toymaker 1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? a. Chou and BTT entered into an agreement that "stipulated that no distribution contact existed unless it was in writing." The e-mail that was sent by BTT would be a contract because it shows the intent and any normal person would assume as Chou did that this was a contract from the negotiations. According to Melvin (2011), this is called the objective standard.…

Words 643 - Pages 3

Big Time Toymaker Case Study

Case Scenario: Big Time Toymaker (BTT) A contract is an agreement between two parties that is enforceable in court. A verbal and/or written becomes valid when there has been a promise, an acceptance, and consideration relating to the terms of the agreement. At any point, a binding contract is breached, “the law provides certain relief for aggrieved parties that suffer losses as a result of another’s party breach of contract” (Melvin, 2011). Therefore, non-breaching party may be awarded with remedies…

Words 864 - Pages 4

Big Time Toymaker Paper

The Big Time Toymaker Case Scenario 1) At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract not including the "negotiation rights" contract? According to Melvin (2011) the word “contract” is often used to describe a written document. Sometimes contracts are not in writing but are still enforceable. A valid contract exists when there is mutual assent between the two parties and an offer has been made and accepted. In the Big Time Toymaker Case, the only time there was a valid contract was at…

Words 885 - Pages 4

LAW421 Week4 BigTimeToyMaker Essay

Big Time Toymaker Kristen Velasquez LAW/421 09/30/2014 Robert Shulman Introduction A contract is an agreement between two parties that is enforceable in court. In order to have a valid contract, there are several criteria that must be met that will be explained throughout this analysis. A verbal or written agreement may result in a binding contract if the required contract criteria…

Words 994 - Pages 4

Essay on Contract and Electronic Reserve Readings.

|[pic] |Course Syllabus | | |School of Business | | |LAW/421 Version 1 | |…

Words 2333 - Pages 10