The District Court ended up ruling that “Terry and Silverman were acting outside of the scope of their employment and solely to further their own personal needs” and ruled in Faragher’s favor. While, the the eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals overturned it and came into the conclusion that the City’s relationship with the supervisors’ did not advocate the treatment towards their co-workers, so the City should be not liable since the City hardly had any distinct knowledge about the harassment initiated by each of the supervisors. Furthermore, they explained that the City cannot be charged for “constructive knowledge” because the sexual harassment policy failed to be known within the lifeguard community. The court claimed that they did not find sufficient …show more content…
The court said that if the issue was serious, then Faragher should have told the City earlier to address it. As a