Case Virginia V Essay

Submitted By lavorgieburage1
Words: 574
Pages: 3
Open Document
Lavorgie Burage 09/30/2014
Case: Virginia V. Black
Fact: Barry Black, Richard Elliott, and Jonathan O'Mara were convicted separately of violating a Virginia statute that makes it a felony "for any person, with the intent of intimidating any person or group..., to burn...a cross on the property of another, a highway or other public place," and specifies that "any such burning...shall be prima facie evidence of an intent to intimidate a person or group." At trial, Black objected on First Amendment grounds to a jury instruction that cross burning by itself is sufficient evidence from which the required "intent to intimidate" could be inferred. He was found guilty. O'Mara pleaded guilty to charges of violating the statute, but reserved the right to challenge its constitutionality. In Elliott's trial, the judge did not give an instruction on the statute's prima facie evidence provision. Ultimately, the Virginia Supreme Court held, among other things, that the cross-burning statute is unconstitutional on its face and that the prima facie evidence provision renders the statute overbroad because the probability of prosecution under the statute chills the expression of protected speech. No. 01-1107. Argued December 11, 2002—Decided April 7, 2003. The judgment is affirmed in part, vacated (set aside) in part, and remanded (sent back for further action by the lower court).

Issue: Does the Commonwealth of Virginia's cross-burning statute, which prohibits the burning of a cross with the intent of intimidating any person or group of persons, violate the First Amendment?

Holding: J/P, Yes, but in a plurality opinion delivered by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, the Court held that while a State, consistent with the First Amendment, may ban cross burning carried out with the intent to intimidate, in which four other justices joined, the provision in the Virginia statute treating any cross burning as prima facie evidence of intent to intimidate renders the statute unconstitutional in its current form, in which three other justices joined. Justice Antonin Scalia left the latter portion of the Court's conclusion to argue that the Court should vacate and remand the judgment of the Virginia Supreme Court with respect to Elliott and O'Mara, so that that court could have an opportunity to construe the cross-burning statute's
Show More

Related Documents: Case Virginia V Essay

Loving V. Virginia Case Study

Loving v. Virginia was a case brought to the Supreme Court in 1967. It’s orgins started with Richard and Mildred Loving, an interracial couple. To exchange wedding vows, the Lovings traveled to Washington DC, where their marriage was legal, and then returned home to Virginia. At the time, Virginia deemed interracial marriage illegal. After a short five weeks, the couple was arrested and charged with a felony for violating Virginia’s anti-miscegenation law. In court, the couple pleaded guilty, and…

Words 371 - Pages 2

Loving Vs Virginia Case Study

In October 1968, Mildred Loving and Richard Loving both had been sentenced to one year in prison in Virginia, for traveling to District of Columbia to get married as an interracial couple. It was legal there for interracial couples to marry but it was not legal in Virginia at that time. The Lovings were given the choice to either stay and serve out their one-year sentence, or they could leave Virginia and not return together for 25 years. The Lovings chose to move to Washington DC until they became…

Words 536 - Pages 3

Judge Bazile: An Interracial Couple Analysis

Judge Bazile to banish an interracial couple from Virginia for 25 years. 23 year-old Richard Loving and 17 year-old Mildred Jeter, an African American, married in 1958 in the District of Columbia where miscegenation, or interracial marriage, was legal. Only weeks later they moved to Virginia, where they were jailed in violation of anti-miscegenation laws. Judge Bazile sentenced the couple to a year in prison, which would be postponed if they left Virginia for 25 years. Five years later, Loving…

Words 1739 - Pages 7

Loving Vs Virginia Research Paper

2024 Loving vs Virginia Loving v. Virginia was a Supreme Court Case that went and banned miscengination, which, by definition, is “sexual relationships or reproduction between people of different ethnic groups, especially when one of them is white.” Miscengination restrictions existed since the colonial period. Out of the fifty US states, nine of them had laws banning them from happening in their states. One of the first cases about race based marriage was the Pace v. Alabama case that happened in…

Words 553 - Pages 3

Supreme Court Case: Tinker Vs. Des Moines

We have the right to our words and actions under the First Amendment. In the case of Tinker vs. Des Moines, the kids were limited from their freedom of speech in school by the school district. This case was taken to the Supreme Court. The verdict for this case was in favor of the plaintiff’s. The Supreme Court ruled that the kids have the right to free speech under the First Amendment. The majority opinion backs up the decision that was made and is the stronger of the two statements about the rulings…

Words 579 - Pages 3

Loving Vs Virginia Essay

In the case, Loving v. Virginia, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Virginia's law prohibiting interracial marriages was a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. This historical landmark case did not come easily. The couple was arrested, tried, found guilty, expelled from their hometown and state, and finally took their plea to the Supreme Court. This well fought battle brought the right of interracial love to all fifty states and the Loving’s. On June 2, 1958, two residents of Virginia, Richard…

Words 1252 - Pages 6

Pad 525 Assignment I Essays

many researchers utilize to interpret the language of the U.S. Constitution and the U.S. legal system in order to explain the principles and process of constitutional, regulatory, and administrative laws at the federal and state levels is using the “case” approach. The methodology of research for this paper is using technology and information resources for researching…

Words 1551 - Pages 7

Loving Vs. Virginia Case Analysis

schools. A vital court case, the Brown v. the Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas case revolutionized the racial equality in today’s society. Before the case was settled, the “separate but equal” doctrine was still active due to the Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) case that authorized segregated schools that had “equal” services for the attenders. The result of Brown v. the Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas was, “Chief Justice Earl Warren declared,…

Words 681 - Pages 3

National Anthem Debate

the controversy on protesting the National Anthem. In many cases, that controversy has trickled down to High School football. In a silent protest Conner Nickerkaep kneeled while the Tiger Marching Band played the National Anthem. Based upon notable cases, Conner kneeling was free speech and the adopted Resolution that was passed by the Cortsen High School Board is unconstitutional. In the case of West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, the Court found that it was unconstitutional to…

Words 640 - Pages 3

Essay about Plaw 210 Memorandum of Law

Susan Patrick From: Virginia M Garman Date: March 4, 2013 Re: Memorandum of Law; Rough Draft QUESTION PRESENTED You asked me to answer the question, “Are the Virginia courts likely to follow the unconscionability doctrine as set out and applied in Jones v. Star Credit Corp.", based on the opinion and rulings of previous similar cases. SHORT ANSWER The Virginia courts are highly likely to follow the unconscionability doctrine that has been set out and applied in Jones v. Star Credit Corp. The…

Words 3101 - Pages 13