Imagine again the one-size-fits-all clothes store, how can they stay in business if another store offered all kinds of sizes and styles? They couldn’t, in the face of competition that provide a better choice for consumers. The traditional public school system of the past had no competition. There was no incentive to improve the quality of education they provided since there was nothing to measure it against. The school choice movement for the first time introduced an alternative to poorly performing public schools. Charter schools make a commitment or charter, to achieve a measurable level of educational performance in a defined period of …show more content…
The choice of school is one of the most active opponents have been the National Education Association, which is representing the public education professionals. The positions the NEA has taken on other issues have often been criticized for its members to support labor interests instead of the best students. One of the programs the NEA has been most vocal against has been school voucher, claims that voucher amount to government funding of religious based schools. On the contrary, citizens can keep a part of taxpayers' money that would have been spent on local public school funding and apply it to a school of their choosing. It is the citizen rather than the government that selects and contributes to a private school, whether it is religiously based or not. Consider families that are already sending children to private schools, they have to pay for private school tuition and in addition to the tax burden for a public school they even didn’t attend public schools. This double burden is unfair and amounts to a government fine for families that pursue a private education without the help of