The Narrator tells us, "I seyde his opinion was good / What should he stude?"(183 – 184) To the reader it is interpreted Chaucer is easily accepted of this claim, but due to the repetition the narrator has following the monks spoken words, you could begin to feel a bit of teasing in his tone. He begins to correlate a mockery towards the monks ideals and his word of mouth. The narrator also take aim at many others. Notice how all are big church advocates, but seem to live opposite lives. Just as the Monk loves to hunt, but has sworn to worship and the Friar is portrayed as a self-indulged hypocrite, the Pardoner admits to selling fake figures to parishioners, and the Prioress Claims to live a life through the church, but is more in love with the fancy jewelery, and having a “wannabe” persona. These are all examples of Those who claim to be one way, but are entirely different. This seems to happen most often when dealing with those from the church. These characters seem to follow hypocrisy over their profound religions. This isn’t the only corrupt topic Chaucer gives insight