Their similar appeals reveal the first comparison between the two articles. Sources distribute arguments led by logos to suggest that there are practical alternatives to chemotherapy among patients. Through these arguments, the authors were able to draw attention to instances where chemotherapy was not the most efficient or desirable choice of treatment. This article aims to disprove the popular belief about chemotherapy, which states that it will likely cure them, and it also prompts the readers to reconsider their beliefs about its necessity and consistency. The authors reach this intention through the use of logos, which is an appeal to logic and evidence. Similar to the first source, the second source makes the same extensive use of arguments driven by logos, which supports its contentions with evidence and logic throughout the piece. The source emphasizes the many advantages of chemotherapy by appealing to the researched and studied