After these cases worked their way up the courts, each had differencing results. The case of The Cherokee Nation v. The State of Georgia was rule that the individual state of Georgia’s laws are not under the court’s jurisdiction and that the Cherokee were in effect under the care of the government, where Judge Marshall calls them “wards.”
While the Court chose to step aside from The Cherokee Nation v. The State of Georgia, they did rule on Worcester v. Georgia. In his deciding opinion, Marshall finds that the Cherokee Nation is its own nation thus have their own sovereignty within the borders of their land holdings. This opinion …show more content…
First, the Ridges accept that the only way to remain a Cherokee Nation is to give up the land. They are outspoken about this, pushing their belief of relocation is the only way to survive. The second blow is that the Ridges were going to have John Ridge (the younger) run for Primary Chief. They felt John Ross canceling elections and suppressing their voice, is a dictatorial move, while Ross felt that this is the only way to keep the powerful Ridges from forcing their conclusions on the fellow Cherokees. With the murder of John Walker Jr., a member of the Ridges group, there is a total break down between the two sides.
j. What treaty did the Ridge faction negotiate in defiance of Chief Ross and the National Council? Why did they do this?
By signing the Treaty of New Echota, the Ridges are committing treason against the Cherokee Nation. They are going against their people’s wishes, and signing without any authority of the Nation. In their hearts they felt they are doing what is best for the people. That if they sign at least they get something out of it where if they sit it out and are forced out, then they get nothing to help start rebuilding in the new lands. They sign knowing that this could lead to their deaths.
k. Ross presented to the Senate a petition to overturn the treaty. What happened to it on the Senate