Chris Mccandless Argument Essay

Words: 156
Pages: 1
Open Document
During Chris McCandless' time in Mexico, he lived on nothing more than "five pounds of rice and what marine life he could pull from the sea," and Krakauer points out that this may have accounted for the young man's belief that he could live off the land in the Alaskan wilderness. This was an arrogant decision on McCandless' part. I find it very odd for McCandless to believe that he could survive in the Alaskan wilderness simply because he had survived in the harsh Mexican climate. Because every situation is very different and these two trips are from different extremes, also that he could never know what circumstances that he could potentially encounter in every different environment. Therefore, he can't base the outcome from a past experience
Show More

Related Documents: Chris Mccandless Argument Essay

Chris Mccandless Argument Essay

throwing away your future, leaving your family, and leaving everything you have and ever will have. Although Chris McCandless thought what he was doing was right...Jon Krakauer incorporated arrogance, innocence, and ignorance by telling the life story of McCandless and his adventures. First, author of Into the Wild, Jon Krakauer, incorporates arrogance in this book pretty clearly. Chris Mccandless grew up in the wealthy Virginia suburbs of Washington D.C. He was a very gifted athlete and scholar, with…

Words 819 - Pages 4

Thoreau Vs Krauker

determine the effectiveness of an argument? What gives the words on the page significance and how does it hold value in the mind of its viewers? How does the message convey itself and does it merit its worth to the audience? Why does it stand out amongst the others? In the works of Thoreau and Krauker, authors who have cultivated the art of writing about the outdoors, how have they both reinforced their claims? Krauker’s non-fiction book Into the Wild and Thoreau’s essay Civil Disobedience. When both…

Words 2477 - Pages 10