Was he just following what he believed, or was he a nincompoop that burned all of his money? The public had spent a long time figuring out what he was after the newspaper clipping was made about him. But clearly stated in Krakauer’s book, it says that it is the readers judgement. In the movie, the viewers are are seeing McCandless as almost as a sad hero. A man that followed his beliefs and with that met his demise. Due to lack of information, and just the lack of no one being around McCandless during times, a side of him is shown that couldn’t have been depicted in the book. Such as Chris talking to himself, his actual death, and what he did exactly during his time away from society and people. The components give of the sense that McCandless was not arrogant, just mislead, where the book lets the reader make that view for themselves. Another part that could’ve added to the movies effect was the fact that there were elements left out. (Krakauer, J., Franklin, P., & OverDrive, Inc. (2013). Into the wild. New York: Books on