Codified Constitution Pros And Cons

Words: 498
Pages: 2
Open Document
The argument over whether a codified constitution is the optimal method of setting out how to govern a state or if it is an uncodified one has complex points to consider. Generally speaking, in my opinion a codified constitution provides a solid set of rules that can help provide stability in new states. This does not however mean that I dismiss those states that do have an uncodified constitution in place. I will be using examples from both traditions to display my fondness for both systems of constitutional governance, and also why, if I was to create my own brand new state, I would ensure a single, codified document was drafted.
An uncodified constitution is one which is not written down in a single document. The most well-known state to have one in place is the United Kingdom. The defining feature of this constitution is the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty. (Dicey, 2013) The term was coined by A.V Dicey, and is not enshrined in any law. It is what is known as a work of authority, this is adhered to in …show more content…
The British system is complicated, and while successful, would be difficult to emulate for a new state in the 21st Century because of the amount of time needed to implement all conventions and common law. Looking at the US Constitution, it was revolutionary in how it set out the separation of powers. (National Archives) However, what must be noted is the fact that Supreme Court appointments are made by the executive, which of course means that they are overtly political, unlike the UK’s independent Judicial Appointments Commission.
All things considered however, it is my belief that a codified constitution is the correct way to set out basic rules for a new state. Its lack of ambiguity makes it clear to citizens and politicians what is permitted. However I can see merits in both methods of constitutional
Show More

Related Documents: Codified Constitution Pros And Cons

Pros And Cons Of Written Constitution

Written constitutions hold numerous pros and cons. The idea of a written constitution in many countries is present, plenty of countries around the world are known to have codified constitutions, an example of this is the USA. Firstly a pro to be discussed is that Constitutions sustain a considerable level of importance within societies (for example the UK Constitution); all constitutions are the highest fundamental principles to there whereabouts, whether this be a country such as the UK or the USA;…

Words 461 - Pages 2

Codified Constituion Essay

Lara Harris Should Britain adopt a codified constitution? Should the UK have a codified constitution? A constitution is a set of rules that establishes how political power should be distributed, the relationship between political institutions, the limits to government, the rights of citizens and how the constitution can be changed. In the UK, we have an uncodified constitution; this means that it is not written down on one single document. However, recently more and more people have become in favour…

Words 1088 - Pages 5

The Three Strikes Law

Three Strikes Law 1 Running head: THREE STRIKES LAW The Three Strikes Law September 24, 2013 CJ526: Unit 2 Three Strikes Law 2 Three Strikes Law The Three Strikes Law has been a subject of much debate since its introduction as a regulation in 1993. The Three Strikes law was enacted in 1994 and is widely recognized as the harshest sentencing law in the United States. “The State of Texas was the first State to enact such a law in 1974…

Words 1355 - Pages 6