Colonial medicine was developed as a way to benefit colonizers and prevent diseases during the imperial rule. While there were certain positive aspects to colonial medicine, primarily advances in medical care of the time, there were also many negative implications (Farmer, et al. 2013) Specific populations where often treated as inferior to colonizers and priority for treatment was given to colonial soldiers and Europeans (Farmer, et al. 2013). The idea of the “diseased native” was common and medicine was often unethical by today’s standards. Many of the legacies of colonial medicine live on today, and two of the most prominent are mistrust of the medical system by specific populations and the notion that certain populations are inferior to others. …show more content…
2013). Smallpox was officially announced as eradicated in 1977 and while the program was considered a success, it was not without negative implications. Vaccination teams went door-to-door and often used coercive and sometimes violent methods in order to reach targeted individuals, primarily in in South Asia (Farmer, et al. 2013) These forced vaccinations bred a resistance to the medical system, primarily vaccination and other medical campaigns, and mistrust of these systems is still common. This is an excellent example of a prominent theory in global health, the theory of unintended consequences of purposive action (Kim, et al. 2010). While the eradication campaign served a greater good, its legacy will live on in those whom were vaccinated by