Common Law Essay

Submitted By cristygustin
Words: 1482
Pages: 6
Open Document
Please be advised that i have submitted this document as a motion to dismiss all litigation involving my family. I request an immediate hearing for emergency relief to return my children to their family without any more incurring damage at the hands of this court. I am attempting to file for immediate emergency relief to the children by allowing immediate reunification of the family so that to stop any more damage than what already exists on these innocent children. I am sure everyone is aware of the fraudulent heinous treatment that our family has incurred at the hands of the department of human services and mainly the youth court advisory panel, not to exclude the judge referee first and foremost, without just cause or even still any solid proof beyond a shadow of a doubt to solidify the accusations of this court. I do understand the rights that anyone in this country is allowed by law and furthermore should be provided. However, for some reason, this does not occur in this specific court system under the gavel of the honorable. This is completely unlawful and unconstitutional and might I add a mockery of the judicial system that is supposed to adhere to a stretegic code of ethics and/or conduct and that is not even including the oath of office the judicial officers of the court are sworn in with when they take office. Everyone is entitled to an impartial unbias, opportunity to explain his side of the legal battle at hand. Innocent until proven guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt was not an option given to us in your courtroom nor was the opportunity to plead our side of the argument and especially to give us the opportunity to show our ability to provide for our children. Our children were never interviewed so that they could be better informed in the courtroom of what the children’s life was like outside of an emergency room. I am not completely sure that jurisdiction of these children was legal considering their caregiver/parents were not residents of Hancock county meaning that neither were the children. I will not dispute that situation anymore since I am disputing all of the only handful of actions provided, illegal as they may be, by your court representatives and DHS. reunification of the family was never even offered nor was a plan or a contract introduced to us until the last proceeding when we were informed of our rights being terminated. however, I followed all rules that were set in court which I could prove if I could get a copy of the court transcripts that I have legally requested to the court on several occasions without any arrangement to provide these documents or tapes. I don’t believe the tapes will matter much other than to prove the bias standing of the judge on the bench of our case whom cross examined me on several occasions and stated without regret her opinion or beliefs of the situation and case as if the way she viewed things made it legally true beyond a shadow of doubt without due process being necessary although neither of us waived our right to this constitutional protection of our rights not to mention the Bill of Rights that this country stands for presently or at least i thought until I entered this courtroom where its a no holds bard, resembling that of a circus act. Never were we informed of our rights, or why we were there or even that we were actually on trial. No Miranda Rights, no due process, no judicial conduct of a chancery proceeding that you would expect if you were being criminally charged like i would have expected, or maybe not.I’m really confused on this so enlighten us ,please. Were we criminally charged with child neglect? If so why wasn’t I booked, fingerprinted, arrested, tried in front of a group of my peers or given a criminal sentence? Where is all of that stuff at? So let me understand this... my husband and I being the natural sovereign individuals that we are, having three children whom were born under the Christian appellation names given to them at birth by
Show More

Related Documents: Common Law Essay

common law Essay

when a government department is considering introducing a new law, it will put together a discussion document called a Green Paper. The aim of this document is to allow people both inside and outside Parliament to debate the subject and give the department feedback on its suggestions. White papers Green Papers are consultation documents produced by the Government. Often when a government department is considering introducing a new law, it will put together a discussion document called a Green Paper…

Words 1702 - Pages 7

Common Law and Pg Essay

worth 2 pts. 1. What is law? Briefly, list and describe the sources of business law. Law is rules of conduct, defining rights and responsibilities (Chapter 1, pg. 2). Business law is the rules of conduct between buyers and sellers. There are several sources for business law. A. Constitutional low refers to the ‘laws’ within the federal and state government. The laws are interpreted from the federal and state written constitution (Chapter 1, pg. 3). B. Statutory laws are ‘statutes’ put forth…

Words 1083 - Pages 5

Business: Law and Common Law Doctrines Essay

have to include? - Name/contact # - Cause of action - Facts - Remedy 4. What 3 things does plaintiff have to show for default judgment? - defendant doesn’t show - proof of service - prima facia burden - Remedy 5. What are 4 most common exceptions to free speech? - False statements of facts - Obscenity - Potential offensive sexual conduct - Fighting words and offensive speech 6. What is Bill of Rights and why is it included in constitution? Name 10 specific individual…

Words 796 - Pages 4

The British origins of common law Essay

origins of common law The common-law system first developed in England and is therefore often referred to as ‘English common law’. Upon colonisation by the British, Australia adopted a common-law legal system. Other countries using this system include Great Britain, Canada, New Zealand and the United States of America. Common law can be best described as a collection of legal principles and rules that is derived from the decisions of judges in higher courts. However, the term ‘common law’ – or ‘judge-made…

Words 2321 - Pages 10

Law - common trial objections Essay

COMMON TRIAL OBJECTIONS "Objection, your Honour, the question is ambiguous." A question is ambiguous if: It may be misunderstood by the witness. It is objectionable on the ground that it may take on more than one meaning. “Objection, your Honour, the question is irrelevant”. A question is irrelevant if: This objection is properly made to exclude evidence which has no logical tendency to prove a fact in issue in the case. "Objection, your Honour, the question mis-states the evidence…

Words 350 - Pages 2

Essay Legal: Common Law and Present Arguments

trial was developed by the British in 1743 as a system of trial. The adversarial system was adopted by Australia. Australia adopted this system of trial as Britain colonised Australia in the 19th century. Britain brought with it a system of law known as ' common law' ". As the name suggests, the adversarial system in Australia refers to a method of trial, which involves contestants or adversaries, that is, it is an adversarial approach in attempting to resolve legal issues between two opposite sides…

Words 663 - Pages 3

Essay on Explain the history of common law and e

a) Explain the history of common law and equity. Prior to the Norman Conquest in 1066 there was no unified system of law in Britain, different areas of the county were governed by different rules. Law was based on local customs within the shires and hundreds. The local customs were enforced and administered over by the shire court which was presided over by the sheriff who was a representative of the King. When William I came into power one of the main aims of the Normans was to centralise the legal…

Words 991 - Pages 4

Comparing Common Law And The Uniform Commercial Code

Learning Team B LAW/421 January 26, 2015 Stacy Mealey Week 5 Reflection In this week’s reflection, we compared and contrasted common law and the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) Article. Common law and UCC contracts have a lot of similarities as well as differences. They both require that a valid arrangement be made between the person offering the product and the person accepting the product. However, UCC may deal with contracts differently from common law. Common law contracts deals…

Words 873 - Pages 4

Student: Common Law and Specific Performance Essay

defense or evidence to disprove the plaintiffs assertion. Equity = Fairness Breach of Contract = Action of Law Legal complaint Specific performance = action in equity A decree (court ruling or official order) for specific performance is an equitable remedy (a relief given to an innocent party to enforce a right or compensate for the violation of a right (chart on p. 13—Action at law) Example of cause of action: Negligence (prove the prime facia elements) 1. Duty 2. Breach 3. Causation…

Words 1352 - Pages 6

Ldula Common law unit9 Essay example

2014 This paper will explain why a case may be tried in a criminal court room and a civil court room. I will analyze the differences between a criminal case and a civil case; what and how the burden of proof is used in the court of law. An ethical discussion of our legal system will be defined and explained within this paper as well as double jeopardy. Criminal court In the state of North Carolina after a person is arrested they go in front of a magistrate who sets a bond for the…

Words 1303 - Pages 6