Compare And Contrast The Articles Of Confederation

Words: 632
Pages: 3
Open Document
“My reading of history convinces me that most Bad Government results from too much government”- Thomas Jefferson.
In its attempt to avoid a strong national government, as most colonists felt England had, the Articles of Confederation restricted the federal government to the point that held virtually no power to enable freedom, democracy, and citizenship to flourish. The Articles of Confederation did not allow the federal government to impose taxes or tariffs or to raise an army. There was no national executive power and no federal court systems, therefore, no checks and balances for the national government. Also, any changes or opposed amendments to the Articles was very difficult to do because there needed to be three-fourths to an anonymous vote of the states for the change to occur. This created problems …show more content…
The Articles of Confederation did not contain a bill of rights nor did it address slavery, citizenship, and an executive branch for the government. Without addressing these few issues, the Articles were inadequate because slavery was a huge issue for the states. Citizenship was not thought of because the Framers did not intend for the United State to become more populated and diverse. Although it did address many individual rights of the people, anti-federalists did not agree with the document because it did not contain a bill of rights. “We are obliged at this time to struggle, with all the Powers with which the Constitution hath furnished us, in Defense of our Rights; to prevent the most valuable of our Liberties form being wrested from us, by the subtle machinations, and daring Encroachments of wicked Ministers”- Samuel Adams. Another issue that was not addressed nor defined was the separation of powers and the three main branches of government; Judicial, Executive, and Legislative, which then allows for check and balances. Checks and balances
Show More

Related Documents: Compare And Contrast The Articles Of Confederation

Compare And Contrast The Articles Of Confederation

The Articles of Confederation were established in 1777, just one year after America fought for her independence from England. The United States was governed under these articles all the way up until 1787, when the Constitution of the United States was ratified. However, this government was,by design, very weak. The thirteen colonies had just fought their way out of what they considered to an oppressive form of government, so they devised a much less intrusive one with the Articles of Confederation…

Words 399 - Pages 2

Compare And Contrast The Articles Of Confederation

The Articles of Confederation were proposed in the year 1777, yet were not ratified until 1781. Under the Articles of Confederation, a national government was formulated in which Congress (the legislative branch) had the ability to declare war, manage the postal service, sign treaties, create alliances, control relations with Indians, nominate foreign ambassadors, determine coin value, issue bills of credit, and designate military officials. Within Congress, all states were to be represented equally…

Words 452 - Pages 2

Compare And Contrast The Articles Of Confederation

The Articles of the Confederation was written when Americans feared a strong national government. Colonist feared any government that could potentially operate similar to the English monarchy under King George. Under the Articles the states would remain independent and Congressional powers would serve as a last resort to settle disputes between states. Congress would be allowed to deal with foreign affairs, maintain armed forces, and coin money. After Shays’ Rebellion, Congress felt they needed a…

Words 137 - Pages 1

Compare And Contrast The Articles Of Confederation

The Articles of Confederation were the first attempt at a new American government and they assisted in organizing the government during the Revolutionary War. The Articles were created to establish a strong, healthy relationship between the 13 states. The Articles were sent to the states for ratification in 1777, but all states did not ratify it until 1781 so it did not take effect until then. The form of government that the Articles set up was a limited government because the powers of the government…

Words 314 - Pages 2

Compare And Contrast The Articles Of Confederation Constitution

the articles of confederation was the building block of our fantastic ation but the constitution is what really made it great, in this passage i'm going to being comparing and contrasting the constitution of the united states and the articles of confederation. First off they had many differences in the texts. like the power to create military for the united states or the power to tax people. the articles of confederation had…

Words 371 - Pages 2

Compare And Contrast The Articles Of Confederation Dbq

Congress introduced the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation were an easy ‘fix’ to the weak union that had just won its independence. At first, this change was thought of as a quickly made government for the states, but was soon revealed to have many deficiencies. Was this simple resolution to the union’s problems efficient? The answer to this question is no. Although it was thought of as a quick mend to the union’s unstable government, the Articles of Confederation were an inefficient…

Words 263 - Pages 2

Compare And Contrast The Articles Of Confederation And The Constitution

The foundation of both the Articles of Confederation (Articles) and Constitution were both based off of the ideals of enlightenment. However, the Constitution overall would be different than the Articles in regard to federalism (balance of power between states and government) and diplomacy. The Articles ultimate fail would cause the creation of the Constitution which is similar to the French Fourth and Fifth Constitutions. In the Articles, the distribution of power between the individual states…

Words 615 - Pages 3

Compare And Contrast The Constitution And Articles Of Confederation

The Constitution and Articles of confederation differ in many ways. They were both meant to strengthen the government but the Constitution was better thought out and made more sense. The Constitution was a better form of government, while the Articles of Confederation were not fixable, and also there were many advantages and disadvantages. The constitution is a better form of government because it gave us a system of courts. The Articles established a league of friendship among the states but…

Words 244 - Pages 1

Compare And Contrast The Articles Of Confederation Vs The Constitution

The Articles of Confederation vs. The Constitution The Articles of Confederation; the original document outlining government in the newly freed United States of America, was quickly replaced by the well know Constitution, but why? If the Articles were so ineffective why where they adopted in the first place? The Articles were rather weak and had many problems, problems that were addressed in the newly formed Constitution. The main problems stemmed from the time in which the Articles of Confederation…

Words 523 - Pages 3

Essay on Apush Constitution Vs

Angela Zhao #6 Compare and contrast the Articles of Confederation and the United States Constitution. Adopted in 1781, the Articles of Confederation established the first national government for the United States, which lasted eight years, providing some stability during the Revolutionary War. Although it was successful at uniting all thirteen colonies, the Articles of Confederation gave a generous amount of power to the states, which left the federal government weak. Instead of achieving a strong…

Words 590 - Pages 3