Comparing Kinkaid's Argument

Words: 1202
Pages: 5

Constructing the basis of any argument involves the element of persuasion, as it is a key necessity all writers need in order to present a strong case. However, argument with reasonability, fairness, and a strong style of argument provides more appeal to targeted audiences overall. Furthermore, writers must be equipped with a selective skillset of research skills, assertiveness, and the ability to understand and debate a topic of their choice. There are a variety of argument styles that either elevate, or demote a writer's text of argument. With that being said, making arguable claims is more about how debatable the topic is, rather than if it is factual. These developed argumentative styles are greatly contrasted between Kinkaid’s Alien Soil …show more content…
Because readers cannot physically hear the writer's tone of voice, the presentation of the writing itself expresses the tone. The author's consideration when it comes to tone of voice is crucial to gaining agreement. Tone of voice presents the reader with the writer's attitude, mood, and personality overall. With this being said, certain emotions can be associated through tone. So, by adopting a voice of reason and one which resonates well with the audience, you can effectively persuade readers to associate text with opinion or fact, even if they are both based on …show more content…
This type of argument approach can be taken in a negative way, as it translates to being emotionally charged. On top of this, a tone of overt aggression on top of not acknowledging, or giving time to the opposition creates a topic less debateable. Audiences are more likely to be receptive to arguments based on logic rather than on an emotionally fueled basis. It is important to not over-insert emotion’s within an argument, as it comes off as emotionally charged rather than with logical explanation. This does not mean to not use emotion