Comparing Plato's The Apology And The Republic

Words: 836
Pages: 4
Open Document
To Examine or Not to Examine? That is the Question

In Plato’s texts, The Apology and The Republic, he provides insight to Socrates’ belief that “the unexamined life is not worth living.” In this theory Socrates syas that life is not worth living so long as people fail to seek wisdom and knowledge on how to live a life of goodness and worth. Wisdom and knowledge are tools that help people learn about life and find it’s value. Socrates believed and taught that when life is examined, you can see the proper way to live it. Throughout Plato’s Republic we are exposed the ideas of truth, goodness, and virtues and the role they play in Socrates’ philosophical life, and in The Apology, we see him defend his beliefs. Before we can determine if Socrates was correct in stating that, “the unexamined life is not worth living,” we …show more content…
In the cave, we see two chained prisoners who are restrained in such a way that they can only face forward to see a wall on which shadows are present. This represents imagination. Because the shadows are all the prisoners have been exposed and is all they know, in their eyes, that has to be what is true. Next, we see the puppets, behind a wall, manipulating the statues that are producing the shadows the prisoners see, using the fire that is behind them. Outside of the cave there is a pond in which we see thought in the form of reflections. In the water the reflections of the physical objects are seen. Which brings us to understanding, where the physical objects are visible and it is realized that the other versions of the objects were just manipulations. Through breaking down the different parts of the cave we see how every step is a critical piece in the philosophical life, which ultimately leads to the acquisition of truth during the processing of
Show More

Related Documents: Comparing Plato's The Apology And The Republic

The Three Modes of Persuasion: Socrates Apology Essay

Persuasion: Socrates’ Apology In speaking of effective rhetorical persuasion, we must appeal to our target audience in a way that will get them to accept or act upon the point of view we are trying to portray. Aristotle said that we persuade others by three means: (1) by the appeal to their reason (logos); (2) by the appeal to their emotions (pathos); and (3) by the appeal of our personality or character (ethos) (Corbett and Connors 32). When Socrates, an infamous rhetorician, gave his “apology” to his fellow…

Words 1326 - Pages 6

A Biblical View of Science, Technology, and Business: Do Utilitarian’s Agree with These Biblical Views? Essay

were terminally ill would completely fall apart with receiving bad news, than it is ok to lie and act as if nothing is wrong, because they would live the remainder of their life contently and with more a higher likelihood of surviving. Now, with comparing the Bible’s beliefs with the Utilitarian’s beliefs, it is likely that the disciples of the Bible would not agree with the doctor’s choice to lie to the patient. Overall, my knowledge on the history of ethics is so limited that even in writing…

Words 1848 - Pages 8