Have you ever been on the frigid peaks of the Himalayas, or the old, curved, rolling hills of the Appalachians? For example, the Himalayas ice peaks with its elements frigid like the arctic, and the people in the roughing it out at the thirty-thousand foot elevation. While the sloping hills of the Appalachians and its people live life at six thousand foot altitude. Furthermore, remember this information as you see the comparison of the Himalayas’ mountains and the Appalachian’s hills and tribes of people.
The Himalayas and Appalachian topography. The Himalayas elevation around 30,000 feet rise high and make it hard to breathe due to the altitude. Differing from the text the Appalachians, “Standing 6,684 feet, Mount Mitchell is the highest point in the North American…show more content… Unlike the Himalayas plateaus, flat surface and deep river gorges, the Appalachian’s high curved hills peak as if they are the baby rock mountains. Both rich for their natural resources, the Himalayans natural gold, zinc, and other resources mined from rocks they have rarely mined, as for the Appalachians rich in their coal clean-burning process. The Appalachian and the Himalayan tribes. The Appalachian’s Native American tribes believe in seeing light-skined giants, opposed to the Himalayan Sherpa tribe believing there is a yeti on their chilly slopes, yet don’t think abominable or snowman exist. The Sherpa’s, according to the Himalayas, “After 3,000 years of living at the high altitudes, these hearty people have developed enlarged lungs that allow them to thrive
