Ancient Rome (around 100 BC) whereas the other lived in the United States (around the 1800s).
Believe it or not, it's hard to imagine that there's actually something that these two have in common – and it isn't just that they were both assassinated leaders. The reason that I chose to compare these two leaders is because basically I'd thought comparing these two leaders would be far more better than the others for some odd reasoning & that I'll have to pick one regardless even if I didn't like the options that were given, so, there's really no special motive …show more content…
I'm not sure if I'll be able to dish out five whole paragraphs about these two leaders but I'll do my best to cover everything needed for this assignment. So, let's go right ahead & start off with Julius Caesar who is the main person we'll be comparing with the other. Now, Julius Caesar was born in Rome in the year of 100 BC on the 12th or 13th of
July & his family were of patrician descent which, put in simple terms, they were one of the higher ups with lots of money. His father, Gaius Julius Caesar, was a praetor which is actually a big deal because a praetor is the second highest position within the Roman Republic Senate – so you could say that his father indeed had some decree of authority. His mother, Aurelia Cotta, was just from an influential family that were of consular rank which is simply just two annually
Elected Chief Magistrates who jointly ruled the Roman Republic – so her family had some type of decent amount of authority, though, not as much as her husband did. At the age of sixteen years, Julius Caesar's father died suddenly in 85 BC making Caesar the head of the household & a year later got nominated to be the High Priest of Jupiter – not like Jupiter is going to