Mrs Donoghue made a claim against the manufacturer, in which she was successful. …show more content…
The final verdict of the House of Lords changed the concept on compensation culture. Donoghue v Stevenson case saw an initial rise and shift to the compensation culture. This case has let to the idea that the compensation culture implies that there is no need to establish that a duty of care was owed to the injured party. As there is no need to establish a breach of duty and causation of loss.
In the case of Harris v Perry [2008] the appellants had hired the bouncy castle for the birthday party of their children. Perry had given Harris permission to play on the castle as even though he was not invited to the party. Whilst playing Harris had been struck on the head by a much taller and older boy performing a somersault. Harris had suffered a depressed skull fracture. Harris's accident occurred when Perry's back was turned. Harris sued Perry due to negligence of supervision. He further held that Perry should not have let Harris and other bigger children use the castle at the same