Compensation Culture

Words: 686
Pages: 3

In the UK context compensation culture features importantly in discussions regarding negligence law. There are cases that encourage compensation culture due to the outcome of large damages. To act as a cause of their misfortune and encourages prospective plaintiffs to find a negligent. There are many legitimate and deserving cases for negligence. Those that encourage the concept of 'compensation culture is the case of Donoghue v Stevenson 1932 Mrs Donoghue drunk a bottle of ginger beer, which came in an opaque bottle and so the content of which could not be seen. After consuming majority of the bottle, Mrs Donoghue found decomposed remains of a snail, due to which she suffered personal injury. As Donoghue had not bought the bottle herself she could not sue for breach of contract.
Mrs Donoghue made a claim against the manufacturer, in which she was successful.
…show more content…
The final verdict of the House of Lords changed the concept on compensation culture. Donoghue v Stevenson case saw an initial rise and shift to the compensation culture. This case has let to the idea that the compensation culture implies that there is no need to establish that a duty of care was owed to the injured party. As there is no need to establish a breach of duty and causation of loss.

In the case of Harris v Perry [2008] the appellants had hired the bouncy castle for the birthday party of their children. Perry had given Harris permission to play on the castle as even though he was not invited to the party. Whilst playing Harris had been struck on the head by a much taller and older boy performing a somersault. Harris had suffered a depressed skull fracture. Harris's accident occurred when Perry's back was turned. Harris sued Perry due to negligence of supervision. He further held that Perry should not have let Harris and other bigger children use the castle at the same