Consequentialism Vs Deontology

Words: 216
Pages: 1
Open Document
Simply looking at the background of Deontology it derives from the Greek language for duty and reason. Deontology is a moral theory that guides what we ought to do and assesses the intent of each action. Deontologists obviously focus on the action, so naturally they would be in opposition with consequentialists. With that said Deontological arguments work best in relation and contrasting with consequentialist theory, also Deontology is the most logical moral decision making paradigm to follow. When looking at consequentialism and the problems, they strengthen the Deontological method in my opinion. Consequentialists essentially say that moral actions and decisions are assessed purely by the results they bring. To make sense of this system
Show More

Related Documents: Consequentialism Vs Deontology

Philosophy Final Review Essay

a situation as variables to be controlled. The dominant modeof thinking in the industrial world, instrumental rationality lacks any notion of limits and has led to the creation of the modern technological infrastructure. • hypothetical imperatives vs. categorical imperative Kant describes reason as issuing demands or commanders to us. Kant calls these commands or demands imperatives Kant also describes rational imperatives as necessities "go to class, do this do that." Hypothetical imperatives…

Words 4122 - Pages 17

Ethics Midterm Notes

Ethics Midterm Review – Lecture Notes Lecture 1 What is Ethics? Accepted standards of behavior; practice of those in a profession; laws and expectations of society Definition of Ethics The discipline dealing with what is good and bad, with moral duty and obligation A set of moral principles; a theory or system of moral values; the principles of conduct governing an individual or a group; a guiding philosophy; a consciousness of moral importance A set of moral issues or aspects Reasons to…

Words 3955 - Pages 16

Final Exam Essay

principle of consequentialism means that the ends justify themeans, but there are certain rules we must follow no matter what theconsequences. Deontological Ethics •Sometimesthe correct path is determined not by consequences but by certain duties. •Duties= Obligations, Commitments, and Responsibilities •Deontologydenies the utilitarian belief that the ends do justify the means. There are just some things we should do, orshould not do, regardless of the consequences. Deontology focuses on:…

Words 1682 - Pages 7

Philosophy 241 Lecture Note Essay

will itself, to character, virtues, vices). 3. Meta-ethics (the epistemology and metaphysics of ethics). Philosophy 541 when taught by Prof. Russ Shafer-Landau. The last unit of this course will take us into meta-ethics. Vocabulary: Normative vs descriptive statements: normative statements (or questions) are about what ought or ought not to be or be done or what would be good (or bad), etc. (for short, 'ought statements') descriptive statements (or questions) are about what is or…

Words 7807 - Pages 32