This occurs when someone is able to discover a new and improved persona of self, because they have the ability to live with more freedom in their daily life (Leming and Dickinson, 2016). This seems most similar to one that has been a caregiver or supporter for a sick family member for a substantial amount of time. Although that person is grieving the death, there could be a sense of relief because they may finally be participating in things they once were unable to. Kavanaugh’s reestablishment concept, and Kubler-Ross’s acceptance are comparable as well. Both ideas hint at preparing for life after the death, looking toward the future, according to Leming and Dickinson (2016). This is considered to be a time sensitive process, but one filled with hope toward life with new meaning. Overall these stages are important to grasp so that we can understand the degree of emotions these families and loved ones are experiencing as they endure the death of a loved one. People may stay in these stages longer than other people, or even revert backwards, but overall they all can relate to one another as they grieve (Leming and Dickinson, 2016). Both Kavanaugh and Kubler-Ross share parallel thoughts that should be acknowledged as natural feelings when one is grieving. As nurses, it is imperative to comprehend what lies ahead for the people in …show more content…
(2013) reported results showing some of the coping methods include social support through a spouse or family, turn to hobbies or pleasurable activities, physical activity, faith, and turning to research. These are all concepts that any health care professional can utilize after not only death, but also a stressful day of work. Granek et al. (2013) also reported that oncologists noted they do not discuss this topic among each other, and some were curious about how others cope. Lastly, some acknowledged trying to send a note to family, assuring them to call if they had any questions, which may provide closure for some (Granek, Mazzotta, Tozer, & Krzyzanowka,