For years students and adults alike have questioned the use of Corporal Punishment or physical punishment in school as a form of discipline. Pate & Gould, some experts in the field say that there is a link from physical punishments to bullying, shootings, or violence. Other varying researches and phycologists suggest that since, in Texas, there has been a history of using corporal punishment there should be a strict implication. Certain schools have been quoted as saying,
“Substitutes for physical punishment have been used by creative teachers for years, and today schools have progressed so far in their thinking about this problem that corporal punishment in school is prohibited by law in one state, New Jersey, and by local school board regulations in several school systems in other states.” (Elsbree & McNally, 1951, p. 41)
Schools prefer not to harm students in any way.
Differential Analysis
In an analysis of all forms and opinions there has been an established desire for - if any student would be required to be punished, have it done in any other menial way. Ingram v. Wright may have continued the trend of physically punishing students in schools. While many states have banned the use of corporal …show more content…
Hyman and James H. Wise have written about how in Texas there is a different but alarming reason against corporeal punishment. In Mesquite High school in Mesquite, Texas there have been reports of students who have been paddled feeling sexually violated because of the way they were punished. One student is quoted as saying "Then they rub the paddle lightly on your rear and bring it back as far as they can and hit you. It hurts real bad." (Maurer, 1979, p. 226). Causing professor of psychology, Dr. Alvin Burstein to say that even a perfectly normal and/or sane individual can be aroused by paddling a member of the opposite sex. This could not only apply from men to women but vice