Cosmological Argument Research Paper

Words: 1729
Pages: 7

There are 3 main arguments that each seek to prove the existence of God; the Ontological, Cosmological, and Teleological Arguments. The three are different in their approaches, but all arrive at the same conclusion. Ontological Argument argues God’s existence from the assumption of the existence a “Greatest thing that can ever be conceived.” From there, it argues that in order for something to be “The greatest thing ever” it must exist physically (that is outside of the mind). The Cosmological Argument argues that since everything in the universe is contingent (or has a cause), there must be a first cause that sets the universe in motion. The final argument is the Teleological Argument, This argues that we can see or discern design in the universe; …show more content…
One objection questions whether or not we know what causes what in the universe. In other words, we may think A causes B, but in reality the events are completely unrelated; making life difficult for those trying to prove a first cause.
This premise seems alright at first, but on closer examination it is faulty. The main reason that Aquinas says that there must be a something that causes everything else to exist is that there is no creation from nothing. But isn't that exactly what this thing that caused everything else is doing? Seems a tad bit defective.
This premise states the necessity of a perfect score on the perfection and goodness meter. But why does there have to be a 100%? No baseball player in history has ever gotten a career batting average of 1.000. But that doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Mother Teresa and Ghandi were extemporary human beings, but by no means perfect.
On the whole I think this argument does rather well. It’s certainly not terrible and a definite improvement from the Teleological Argument. The idea of a first cause is very interesting and is personally compelling. But I do think that many of the objections are particularly compelling. This makes this argument more of a toss up in my mind than the Teleological argument.

Ontological